|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: ORBS (Re: Scanning)
> Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 10:24:57 -0700 > From: Roeland Meyer <[email protected]> > > So, you aren't happy when I build a poisoned cake for spammers, you want > me to use your specific recipe... even if mine works (better?). Tell me Explain how yours works on the same level or better. > how a MAPS-blocked system can relay spam. Nobody claimed that it could. Tell me what percentage of open relays are listed in MAPS. MAPS does not probe like ORBS does. By its more conservative nature, much more spam gets by MAPS than ORBS. Is this good? Is it bad? Judgement call. > Yes, I'll concede that your approach may work, albeit at higher HW cost > than my approach. Let's factor in the cost of wasted bandwidth when one gets hijacked, and the cost of having an MX handle the extra spam traffic. Eddy --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. EverQuick Internet Division Phone: (316) 794-8922 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT) From: A Trap <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature. These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT send mail to <[email protected]>, or you are likely to be blocked.
|