North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: Stealth Blocking

  • From: Roeland Meyer
  • Date: Fri May 25 13:53:48 2001 
The original message never made that distinction.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shawn McMahon [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 4:30 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Stealth Blocking
> 
> 
> On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 08:04:34PM -0400, Jason Slagle wrote:
> > 
> > And, as a business we wouldn't divert you.  This is only a 
> solution for
> > Resi accounts.
> 
> You do realize, I assume, that if somebody thinks he's sending email
> directly to a certain server, and you divert it to another server,
> you're intercepting it under the terms of the Electronic 
> Communications
> Privacy Act of 1986?
> 
> That's allowed if it's necessary to provide the service, but good luck
> winning on that argument with the plaintiffs trotting out 
> witnesses stating
> it's not necessary, just your choice.
> 
>