|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: A question on CE to PE route exchanges ...
Even i am interested in knowing the exact issue with using IGPs? What is the most common CE-PE route exchange behaviour now ... Static routes OR IGP OR BGP?? Dave, are you referring the CE loopback address also to be local? cheers, Elwin. --- Alex Mondrus <[email protected]> wrote: > Dave > > I also like the RFC2547bis. > > I would like to learn more about your painful > experience with IGP in this > context. Please elaborate a little bit more on this > subject -> Dave Israel > wrote "Besides, in at least one major current > implementation, your IGP > options are painfully limited." > > http://www.ipoptical.com > > Thanks in advance, Alex > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Israel > [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 5:45 PM > To: Elwin Eliazer > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: A question on CE to PE route exchanges > ... > > > > On 5/18/2001 at 14:13:53 -0700, Elwin Eliazer said: > > > > Hi, > > > > RFC2547bis suggests the use of EBGP between > > CE and PE routers; Is this a preferable model for > > service providers and enterprise customers, when > > compared to using IGP? > > Yes. BGP is designed for network borders. Besides, > in at least one > major current implementation, your IGP options are > painfully limited. > > > Are there anyone who have deployed this? If so, > > how is the EBGP peering setup if the CE router > > is with a local (VPN) IP address? > > The BGP session lives in VPN space, the routes only > exist in VPN > routing tables. Your CE having a VPN address is > really just the > natural solution. > > -Dave ===== ------- Elwin Stelzer Eliazer Corona Networks ------- __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/
|