North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: AS Leakage
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Darrin Walton wrote: > |+ > |+ As someone mentioned previously this week, many of the folks are posting > |+ from email addresses that give absolutely no hint at to their employment. > > I didn't know that we were required to post from our "work" email > address, or that we had to share with _you_ where we worked. A lot of us > don't feel like subscribing to _any_ mailing list with our work email, as > we already get enough mail there (I can't speak for you though). Did I say anything about requirements or anyone sharing employment history with me? I simply restated a previous observation which is that many list participants post from someplace other than their work email address. I got bombarded with emails from people because they ASSUMED that I knew someone worked for 3967. I didn't. > > Do you purpose that everyone now send a email to the list, stating > who they are, where they work at, and what they do? I think not. > I propose that you treat me in the manner in which you expect to be treated. That is all I propose. The last time I checked, it wasn't me who pissed in your cereal. > |+ Had I known he was with Exodus, there would have been no question about > |+ his having multiple paths into UU. Please forgive me for assuming. I > |+ also assumed that 209 would not leak _65..._ into the global table. > > So, you were under the belief that a rather large service > provider, only had one connection to UUNet? How many paths do you, > yourself have into UU? Are they anything > DS3? > Did you bother reading the post prior to replying? Is English not your primary language? Is there some other reason why you don't understand "Had I known he was with Exodus, there would have been no question about his having multiple paths..."? As for paths into 701, we three. All of them > DS3. Have a nice day Darrin. --- John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc
|