|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Search Engine Accountability (was RE: Reality Check)
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:36:31 PST, Karyn Ulriksen said: > Search Engine requires a key certificate style license embeded in > the html or website (whether it's internet centralized or just for the And the key came from *where*? And this would be different from the current hassles of getting a PKI certificate *how*? > search engine). A "rating" and "type" is associated with the license for > the type of site it is. As the search engine crawls the site, if the > license is gone... it doesn't get listed. If the type and rating doesn't Woo woo.. So I have to fork over $$$ to a company to publish stuff on the web? Or is this license "for free" - in which case it's probably worth what you paid for it? > match the information associated with the license data... it doesn't get OK.. A .JPG of a man and a giraffe would probably be acceptable for all ratings. A .JPG of a man and a giraffe having sex would probably NOT be acceptable. How did you tell the difference? > listed. If the license certificate doesn't match the IP(s) associated with > the certificate... it doesn't get listed. Has anybody tried something like Great. I relocate my server to a new co-lo and I drop off the search engines unless I fork out new money for a new license. And if you don't think this won't happen, I'll point you at all the companies that we currently license software from who are *always* ready at the drop of a hat to ship us a new license for a machine "because the CPU planar died and was replaced so the hostid is now different". Yeah. We *never* have a problem getting new licenses. ;) > this before? Umm.. there's PICS and other web rating systems already extant. They've worked wonders, haven't they? Valdis Kletnieks Operating Systems Analyst Virginia Tech
|