North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: Inane ... even for NANOG.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Hank Nussbacher [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 11:35 AM > To: Roeland Meyer > Cc: '[email protected]' > Subject: Re: Inane ... even for NANOG. > > > On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Roeland Meyer wrote: > > > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 9:57 AM > > > > > On Thu, 15 Mar 2001 09:22:52 PST, Roeland Meyer > > > <[email protected]>said: > > > > > 16.1.16.1; I don't > > > > > Sorry, it was the hex representation, of course. > > > > > > > HEX:=="313631313631" > > > > > > I think the intended value was 0x10011001 > > > > And the signifigance of this bit pattern is ...? > > > > [from too many decades doing assembly level communications > drivers to handle > > both ASCII/EIA and EBCDIC. Nothing there is either special > or amusing, > > anymore. Not for decades.] > > > > so ... who is Fifi? > > 15 in hex is x'0f'. 16 is x'1f'. 15.1.15.1 would be fifi. > 16.1.16.1 is > something else. 15 = 0x0f 16 = 0x10 011001011001 it still makes no sense.
|