|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Statements against new.net?
In message <[email protected]>, Rafi Sa dowsky writes: > > >Hi Hank > > In this particular case ".XXX" as "generic" suffix is probably not a good >choice - I'm sure someone would pay a lot of money for this particular >gTLD ... I think that that was Hank's point -- the owner of the One True .xxx will make lots of money. > >Regards > Rafi > >On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > >> >> On Tue, 13 Mar 2001 [email protected] wrote: >> >> > I fail to see how RFC2826 is in any way "political".Upon careful re-readin >g >> > it boils down to: >> > >> > If you use one root, everybody agrees what things look like. >> > >> > If you use multiple roots, what people will see depends on which root they > ask. >> > >> > How is this political? >> >> It isn't, but since these cyber-carpetbaggers have failed on the technical >> end to get their way, they figure if they can turn it into a political >> issue then they can involve their clueless congressman to jump in and make >> all sorts of investigations and subcommittees and perhaps they will end up >> with the pseudo-jackpot of a .xxx suffix in their hands. >> >> -Hank >> >> >> >> > > > --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
|