North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Statements against new.net?
> > I fail to see how RFC2826 is in any way "political". Upon > > careful re-reading it boils down to: > > > > If you use one root, everybody agrees what things look like. > > > > If you use multiple roots, what people will see depends on > > which root they ask. > > > > How is this political? > > It becomes political when it goes beyond those two statements > and says "Since these two statements are true, everyone should > use one root." I disagree. If you accept the premise of the RFC, which is that the goal is to be able to communicate effectively, then this is a natural consequence of the first two statements, as explained in the RFC. > It becomes completely political when it expands that to > encompass the concept of "ICANN root is the one true root. > Thou shall have no other root before me." Chapter and verse, please. You must be reading something I don't; I can't find any statements in there which says this. Regards, - H�vard
|