North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Namespace conflicts
UDRP REFERENCE: http://eon.law.harvard.edu/udrp/library.html Roeland Meyer wrote: > Actually, the courts aren't well engaged right now. They've been > short-circuted by the UDRP. UDRP arbitrators are NOT courts. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Shawn McMahon [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 3:16 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Namespace conflicts > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 02:51:30PM -0800, bob bownes wrote: > > > > > > > On the other hand, if my TV let me type in "CNN" and it > > came back with > > > > the right channel, that would scale beautifully as long > > as nobody else > > > > was dumb enough to name their channel CNN. > > > > > > > > > > Or dumb enough to name it IBM...Therein lies part of the problem. > > > > I don't see that it's a problem. First-come first-served worked fine > > until the courts got involved. > > > > -- Thank you; |---------------------------------| | Thinking is a learned process. | | ICANN member @large | | Gigabit over IP, ieee 802.17 | | working group | | Resilient Packet Transport | | http://www.luminousnetworks.com | |---------------------------------| Henry R. Linneweh
|