RE: new.net

• From: Mathew Butler
• Date: Thu Mar 08 20:32:00 2001

You -could- always do the whois-type thing, where ALL records containing 'apple' are returned, on first access to the name?

-Mat Butler

-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Lockhart [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 2:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: new.net

>Therefore any company which creates a broader hierarchy is not motivated
>by what's best for Internet users, who are best served by a simple
>hierarchy (IBM is IBM is IBM no matter what you append to it). 

Okay. You picked an example which proves your point. However, there's
plenty of exceptions. Who should have "apple" in this flat namespace?
Apple Computers? Apple Records? Apple Fruitstore?

While the BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) is a fairly well-known
name worldwide, what gives us more claim to "bbc" in the flat namespace
than "Big Blue and Cousins" or "Baptist Bible College" (bbc.org and
bbc.edu respectively)? Have we now got bbc.com because we had a greater
claim to it, or because we had the better lawyers?

Simon
--
Simon Lockhart                       |   Tel: +44 (0)1737 839676
Internet Engineering Manager         |   Fax: +44 (0)1737 839516
BBC Internet Services                | Email: [email protected]
Kingswood Warren,Tadworth,Surrey,UK  |   URL: http://support.bbc.co.uk/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: new.net Shawn McMahon
  • RE: new.net Ken Eddings

• Prev by Date: Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play
• Next by Date: RE: Namespace conflicts
• Date Index
• Thread Index
• Author Index
• Historical