North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: MS explains
If Microsoft's problem was with routing to their DNS network, why did MX records resolve just fine? I'm afraid I don't understand that part. Is there policy routing or load balancing or something that can route MX requests to one set of dns servers while routing host requests to another set of DNS servers? As far as I can tell today, responses to my requests of the same DNS server for host records and MX records are returning from the same IP, 207.46.138.11, so it doesn't appear to me that different DNS servers are responding to different types of requests. -----Original Message----- From: Omachonu Ogali [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 8:25 AM To: Dan Hollis Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: MS explains On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 08:40:19PM -0800, Dan Hollis wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Eric A. Hall wrote: > > At 6:30 p.m. Tuesday (PST), a Microsoft technician made a configuration > > change to the routers on the edge of Microsoft's Domain Name Server > > network. > > At approximately 5 p.m. Wednesday (PST), Microsoft removed the changes to > > the router configuration and immediately saw a massive improvement in the > > DNS network. > > So basically, it took microsoft 23 hours to fix a router configuration. > > -Dan > > s/router configuration/default route/ -- Omachonu Ogali [email protected] http://www.informationwave.net
|