North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: net.terrorism

  • From: Jerry Scharf
  • Date: Tue Jan 09 16:02:14 2001 
I can't resist trying to sum this up:

Somebody wants to talk to an ORBS server and has Abovenet transit. They don't 
like being caught in the orbs/abovenet mess.

So rather than
 a) getting a new provider
 b) getting another provider and fixing the local routing to use them to ORBS

the person opted for
 c) send a misleading flame message to NANOG

Operational issues of enforcing trafic delivery policies for customers has 
been discussed till it's dead. Everyone knows where they stand, and anyone who 
does it has is as part of their service agreement. As has been pointed out, 
this is not a subject that will engender any sympathy in this group.

does anything else need to be said? If not, let's let this die.

jerry