|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN?
Oh, come on. You must not monitor NANOG that much. Otherwise, you would know that if I was flaming, anyone with a bell*.* address would be in a burn ward. I was just making a simple observation. Can I help it if every contact I've had, save one, with bell*.* has been a clueless, old-fart, union-so-you-can't-replace-him-her-with-someone-with-clue, wouldn't know a clue if it came up and bit them in the a$%@^[email protected]%^ piece of %^&#%&^#?!??? who is sucking up oxygen from the script kiddies (who while I hate, may actually grow up some day and do something productive)??!!!??? Don't want to be associated with that stereotype? Get rid of 99% of your organization or go to work for someone else. BTW: I know from first hand experience. I had to leave a job at a bell*.* company because as a 19 y/o. I made the 20/30/40/50/60 y/o's nervous as far as their jobs were concerned. 'Nuff said. --- John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Christian Kuhtz wrote: > > John, > > I disagree with Deron, albeit for different reasons. But I don't think the > flame was neccessary. > > Cheers, > Chris > > -- > Christian Kuhtz <[email protected]> -wk, <[email protected]> -hm > Sr. Architect, Engineering & Architecture, BellSouth.net, Atlanta, GA, U.S. > "I speak for myself only." > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of > > John Fraizer > > Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 7:01 PM > > To: Deron J. Ringen > > Cc: Simon Lyall; [email protected] > > Subject: RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? > > > > > > > > On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Deron J. Ringen wrote: > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of > > > > Simon Lyall > > > > Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 3:03 PM > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Subject: Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? > > > . > > > . > > > > One of the companies we work with has 192.168 address for some of the > > > > radius servers we have to talk to, we are directly connected to them so > > > > it's not a big pain but it's just so ugly. > > > . > > > . > > > That makes perfect sense to me...there is not a better way to > > protect a box > > > from a DOS/hack than to only give it a private address. Why expose a box > > > to the outside world if there is not a need??? > > > > Deron, > > > > Ever heard of an access list? Didn't think so. > > > > > Deron J. Ringen > > > Sr. Network Architect > > > BellSouth Internet Services > > > > Typical. > > > > --- > > John Fraizer > > EnterZone, Inc > > > > > > > > > > >
|