North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: florida ix(en) facing south

  • From: Scott Patterson
  • Date: Thu Dec 21 13:39:38 2000

OK, I'm not going to spend my day arguing for shockwave, or against it.  If
you want to read the site, read it.  If not, don't.  Either way, I agree
that I would like to see the two initiatives working a little closer


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bennett Todd [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 1:11 PM
> To: Scott Patterson
> Cc: Randy Bush; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: florida ix(en) facing south
> 2000-12-21-12:17:26 Scott Patterson:
> > 2000-12-21-09:13:08 Randy Bush:
> > > folk clueless enough to put up a shockwave-only page sure ain't
> > > gonna get a lot of big isp business.
> > That's marketing folks for ya.  Can't hold that against what the
> > NAP can offer.
> Actually, you can.
> If the website doesn't conform to reasonable standards, then either
> the company doesn't have technically competant people, or else they
> aren't able to influence the public website. Either way, I'd
> certainly steer a wide berth around any such company.
> It's within the bounds of possibility that the company really has
> technically competant people, who don't for whatever reason care
> about the public presence of their company on the net, but could fix
> it if they bothered. Even that fantasy scenario doesn't make me want
> to do business with them.
> -Bennett