North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: Packet Loss
Can we call on the Avian Carrier RFC here? Packet Loss may take on a whole new meaning here... K (sorry, couldn't resist) > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark E. Perkins [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 9:42 AM > To: Randy Bush; Charles Smith > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Packet Loss > > > > Perhaps you mean 2680? (As in RFC) > > --On Thursday, December 14, 2000 5:20 PM +0000 Randy Bush > <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > >> Does anyone have a good definition of packet loss? If so, > please send me > >> the appropriate verbiage. I cannot seem to articulate a strict > >> definition. > > > > 2628 > > > > > > >
|