|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: Qwest/forthelife.net rfc1918 goodness
Its not Q with the 1918 addressing. notice: 8 chi-edge-17.inet.qwest.net (205.171.20.154) 64 msec 64 msec 68 msec edge = elvis has left the building .chance -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Alex Pilosov Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 8:16 PM To: Mark Mentovai Cc: Jade E. Deane; [email protected] Subject: Re: Qwest/forthelife.net rfc1918 goodness On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Mark Mentovai wrote: > > I used to think that this was wrong also, and I would never build a > network like that, but aside from making for ugly traceroutes, there's > really nothing wrong with it. RFC 1918 doesn't address this issue It, together with a martian ingress-filters break PMTU-D _IF_ any of the links between these routers has MTU less than 1500. This topic pops up on nanog every 4-6 months, but I doubt that it'll make home.net or qwest change their addressing schemes. -- Alex Pilosov | http://www.acecape.com/dsl CTO - Acecape, Inc. | AceDSL:The best ADSL in Bell Atlantic area 325 W 38 St. Suite 1005 | (Stealth Marketing Works! :) New York, NY 10018 |
|