North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: Qwest/ rfc1918 goodness

  • From: Chance Whaley
  • Date: Sun Dec 10 22:26:21 2000

Its not Q with the 1918 addressing.

notice: 8 ( 64 msec 64 msec 68

edge = elvis has left the building


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of
Alex Pilosov
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 8:16 PM
To: Mark Mentovai
Cc: Jade E. Deane; [email protected]
Subject: Re: Qwest/ rfc1918 goodness

On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Mark Mentovai wrote:
> I used to think that this was wrong also, and I would never build a
> network like that, but aside from making for ugly traceroutes, there's
> really nothing wrong with it.  RFC 1918 doesn't address this issue

It, together with a martian ingress-filters break PMTU-D _IF_ any of the
links between these routers has MTU less than 1500. This topic pops up on
nanog every 4-6 months, but I doubt that it'll make or qwest
change their addressing schemes.

Alex Pilosov            |
CTO - Acecape, Inc.     | AceDSL:The best ADSL in Bell Atlantic area
325 W 38 St. Suite 1005 | (Stealth Marketing Works! :)
New York, NY 10018      |