|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Traceroute versus other performance measurement
At Wednesday 01:54 PM 11/29/00, [email protected] wrote: >| At the expense of using all their bandwidth ttcp should provide some >| reasonable measure of performance under those circumstances. > >ttcp has the disadvantage of invariant 5-tuple, which is germane to >this problem. > > Sean. While this is moving rapidly towards a rather marginal topic, the above struck me. And Google says for "tuple ttcp" : http://www.cs.umn.edu/classes/Spring-1999/csci5212-nh/toc.html Do I understand it correctly that the "invariant 5 tuple" refers to 5 non-variable aspects of this performance test, being namely: - tcp or udp or icmp(?) protocol - local IP address - local protocol port or message type - remote IP address - remote port port or message type E.g.: performance measurements will gravitate towards a result not representative for the totality of all traffic, as the 5 variables are rather fixed, or at the least fixed for the duration of the test ? Has intelligent switching and forwarding (Layer-4 and up) started to make such a significant impact on end-to-end performance that all traditional performance tests must necessarily be flawed ? (there must be a reason why my MRTG graphs of HTTP GET's to websites are so much more consistent than icmp pings...) -- "Just say No" to Spam Kai Schlichting New York, Palo Alto, You name it Sophisticated Technical Peon Kai's SpamShield <tm> is FREE! http://www.SpamShield.org | | LeasedLines-FrameRelay-IPLs-ISDN-PPP-Cisco-Consulting-VoiceFax-Data-Muxes WorldWideWebAnything-Intranets-NetAdmin-UnixAdmin-Security-ReallyHardMath
|