|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police
You missed the point. The filters were removed the moment we were able to get a suitably authorized NOC tech (next morning). That didn't change the fact that I incurred losses from paying three expensive contractors, for a full night of over-time, as a direct result of the unannounced filter. The contractors got paid, how do I recover the losses caused by the contract breach? The upstream refuses, therefore we must go to court. > -----Original Message----- > From: Shawn McMahon [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 7:20 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police > > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 02:12:38PM -0800, Roeland Meyer wrote: > > > > engineers doing this when it could have been prevented? I > have. Three > > contractors, doing this, in over-time, at Silicon-Valley > rates is well over > > $20K. More than enough to make it worth my while to sue my upstream. > > And did you sue, or did you request the filter be removed? > > You stated earlier in this thread that what you would do, and what > anyone reasonable would do, is immediately call their lawyer. > > Did you call him first, or did you contact the upstream first? > >
|