North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions)
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 01:02:38PM -0800, Sean Donelan darkened my spool with the following: > > On Wed, 15 November 2000, john heasley wrote: > > i think all agree that filtering large/teir 1 peers (let's assume teir 1 is > > defined as a peer who sends a large number of routes, ie: ignore the > > business BS) the way customers are/should be filtered (by exact match prefix) > > is impossible with the hardware (and/or implementations) available today. > > Five years ago there wasn't a single IP router capable of doing OC48 either. > > How do we fix this? > > 1) Convince large/tier 1 peers to include full route table filter requirements > in their purchasing when deciding whether to buy Cisco or Juniper? > > 2) Pass the Internet Stability Act of 2000 mandating full peer filters by > 2002, and providing for civil fines by any affected party against any tier > one not in compliance? Any router vendor not in compliance will be removed > from the GSA purchasing schedule. > > > This is a very old problem folks. We've known about several solutions for years. > > great, that must be why these problems dont occur. which solution are you using? i'm not flinging s*[email protected] over the fence; i'm truely interested.