North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: Fire protection in ISPs and collocation facilities
On Sun, 05 November 2000, "Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote: > Perhaps it's worth observing that fire is but one of the classic > Elemental Forces, and I've personally had far more problems with > water than with fire. In my experiences, the water came from > firefighting elsewhere in the building, but several instances of CO > flooding and the like have been mentioned in recent posts--New > Rochelle (?) AT&T vs. Verizon? Welcome to business reality. 1999 wasn't the first time the Rochelle Park central office flooded. It also flooded in 1977. New Jersey Bell decided not to move the central office after the first flooding incident. I think you will find it is more cost effective for Bell Atlantic to pay off a few subscribers every few decades than to move the central office. Bell Atlantic has 18 central offices located in 100 year flood zones. But BA/Verizon only pays refunds on complete loss of telephone service. For example, 37,000 people lost all phone service in Rochelle Park. If you assume BA paid each subscriber $4 compensation, its works out to about $148,000. A conservative estimate is $6-$10 million to move the central office. If you were a bean counter what would you do? > While I doubt it's practical to develop exhaustive water protection > measures to guard against large-scale flooding, unless there's a move > to convert surplus submarines to colo centers, I'd like to see the > fire protection code be more exhaustive about diverting water away > from unaffected faciities. This is an admirable goal, but I think the fire codes are the wrong place to put it. There is already too much junk in the fire codes, unsupported by scientific evidence. FEMA and the building codes cover flood plains. Although there is always something. If you literally followed every contingency site requirement people have, there is no place on earth which meets them all. I sometimes think companies focus too much on the hardware. You should talk to the techs and engineers keeping things going. A good set of people can keep things going even during the unexpected, unplanned, and unknown. Of course, you need to give them a fighting chance, but concrete won't keep the water out if the door is left open. Whether it is network engineers or building engineers, clue is important. I'm working with some facility engineers who were trained in the navy. Waiting for the field service engineer to show up sometimes isn't an option on a ship. Not only do they know how to deal with water, but they also know how to keep things going.