North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Since they don't own the backbone, their SLAs apply only to their PNAPs, i.e. they cannot guarantee performance, packet loss, delay, outages, etc over somebody else's backbone (e.g. Sprint, UUNet, AT&T, etc). Many large enterprises are leveraging on the Internet to deploy VPN connectivity between company sites as a replacement for Frame Relay or ATM PVCs. In such cases, it's very important to make sure that the service comes with the right SLAs. -----Original Message----- From: Tom Schmidt [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 5:42 PM To: [email protected] Subject: InterNAP? I need your opinion on InterNAP. I am currently have a DS3 to my current provider and want to add an additional DS3 for redundancy to the same location. We plan to run BGP4 on both connections. InterNap has some technology to avoid congested peering points. Does this technology actually work? Isn't it impossible to avoid these peering points? What are your experiences with InterNAP? _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.