|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Incident response (was Re: whois )
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 [email protected] wrote: :Umm... would you be satisfied with a "We've referred it to the appropriate :people" response? : :At least here, and probably many other universities, we're stuck not being :able to say much more than that due to student confidentiality rules... :Yes, we take action. No, we usually can't say what we did. A general incident response capability would be usefull, but unfortunately this requires more cooperation than most companies are willing to give. Would it be worthwhile to include security incident handling policies and procedures in peering agreements? i.e a peering agreement also includes a testable disaster recovery plan, and a security incident response plan. It is fairly obvious by now that a peering agreement is more than simply an agreement on a router configuration. I'm wondering if anyone would consider something like this a little more robust than the centralized CIRTs and industry associations, as it would be relative to local policy, and the participants have a direct existing relationship with each other. This, as opposed to dependance on a neutral co-ordinating centre which may be dealing with other problems. -- batz Reluctant Ninja Defective Technologies
|