North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: whois
As a general rule, a response of any sort is preferable to nothing, at least it means somebody bothered to read the complaint, which is quite a stretch from the truth in quite a few places. > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of > [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 10:12 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: whois > > > On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:53:16 EDT, Marshall Eubanks > <[email protected]> said: > > Are you really saying that if I tell you that a dial-up user on > your network > > hacked into my system at some precise time, from a precise IP address > > (so that you could probably tell easily which user did it), and did so > > in a fashion > > which suggested an automated "script kiddie" effort, I should only > > expect a response from you if I PAY for it ?!? > > Umm... would you be satisfied with a "We've referred it to the appropriate > people" response? > > At least here, and probably many other universities, we're stuck not being > able to say much more than that due to student confidentiality rules... > > Yes, we take action. No, we usually can't say what we did. > -- > Valdis Kletnieks > Operating Systems Analyst > Virginia Tech > >
|