North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: decreased caching efficiency?
--- Jason Slagle - CCNA - CCDA Network Administrator - Toledo Internet Access - Toledo Ohio - [email protected] - [email protected] - WHOIS JS10172 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GE d-- s:+ a-- C++ UL+++ P--- L+++ E- W- N+ o-- K- w--- O M- V PS+ PE+++ Y+ PGP t+ 5 X+ R tv+ b+ DI+ D G e+ h! r++ y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Dana Hudes wrote: > Yes I do. I don't have rights to spew ads on other peoples content, > but my content is mine. I can have the page refuse to display without > the ads if I so choose. Sure, you have the right so spew them on your page, but I have the right to not view them if I don't want to see them. I looked at your page and no where do I see a mention of the fact I HAVE to view the ad to see the picture. I see a request that I do so in the statusbar. > No, it doesn't delay unless the ads are delayed. If the ads come right up the photo loads right away. > Otherwise (due to JavaScript issues that prevent use of an event-driven model) the script checks frequently to see if the ads are up. > People with slow computers that have current browsers and o/s with inadequate RAM experience slow display. > > My content is my property not yours. Not arguing that. More and more frequently there has been this drive for cheap bandwidth to the homes. The margins on cablemodem/DSL from what I can tell are VERY low and caching plays a large part in making it possible from the models I've ran (We are not yet into broadband, but should be within a month or 3). Are you willing to pay a premium for uncached service? I'll surely provide it to you if you are. But, when you want 1.5mbs down for $40 a month, you can pretty much guarntee that I'm going to do whatever I can to limit the amount of traffic to you that leaves my network. Jason
|