North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
RE: netscan.org update
> From: Troy Davis [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 9:49 AM > > On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Roeland M.J. Meyer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I know that all of you are aware of this. Granted, each subsequently > > smaller subnet also limits the maximum number of hosts that > will respond > > to the smurf trigger. The point is that, the web-site ONLY > tests 0 and > > Actually, that's often not the case. Through NAT and other modern > marvels, it's possible to have massively overpopulated netblocks that > all respond. The largest amplifier we've found yet was 170,000x (on > a class C). Thank you Troy, However my point remains.