North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Why did we do CIDR? (RE: Confussion over multi-homing)
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 02:50:07PM -0700, Sean Donelan wrote: > If folks are going to deaggregate the addresses and announce multiple routes > anyway, why are we going through the pain of ARIN policies. Wouldn't it be > better to allocate the appropriately sized address in the first place? Yes, it would. It would seem ARIN should allocate small blocks on a trade-in only policy. You can get a /24, but when you go to a /23 you _will_ renumber, and soforth up to a /19 or so, at which time when you need more you get an additional prefix. That way you limit it to 1 route per ASN for small players, and everyone can multihome. -- Leo Bicknell - [email protected] Systems Engineer - Internetworking Engineer - CCIE 3440 Read TMBG List - [email protected], www.tmbg.org
|