North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation

  • From: David Lesher
  • Date: Thu Sep 14 09:36:40 2000

Unnamed Administration sources reported that William Allen Simpson said:
> 
> 
> "To exempt from reciprocal compensation requirements telecommunications 
> traffic to the Internet. "
> 
> Anybody know about this?  Seems like it kills payments by ILECS to CLECs 
> for dialups, when the calls are to an ISP.  Note, only _TO_ an ISP; 
> folks wanting to provide voice are still required to pay ILECs for 
> traffic _from_ an ISP.
> 
> Is this the "ILECs put ISPs out of business" act?

Yes. 

Per folks in telecom regulation field; that's exactly what
the Bells want. And they all pulling out all the stops,
lobby-wise.

They screwed up BIG time by *demanding* recip comp. They now want
the Emperor's New Clothes to correct that.




-- 
A host is a host from coast to [email protected]
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433