|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: UUnet Kansas City/Denver
My upstream is Cerf.NET, whom is apparently now owned by AT&T. They are absorbing the CERF.NET backbone into AT&T. I have been having sporadic connectivity for the past three weeks. Apparently, the feast isn't going quite as smoothly as planned. I expect sporadic major outages for the remainder of the year, from this bunch. > -----Original Message----- > From: Bryan Heitman [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2000 5:37 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: UUnet Kansas City/Denver > > > > Yes Erik we use AT&T, however that is for only local > circuits. We don't > have any long haul with them which is probably why we're not > seeing any > problems... > > If I had to guess I would say that Kingdom City is in AT&Ts path that > connects KC and St. Louis. As it is about in the center of the state > directly east of KC. > > Best, > > > > Bryan Heitman, Vice-President > CommuniTech.Net, Inc. - (800) WEB-HOST > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Adam Korab" <[email protected]> > To: "Bryan Heitman" <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2000 7:29 PM > Subject: Re: UUnet Kansas City/Denver > > > > On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 07:21:15PM -0500, Bryan Heitman wrote: > > > UU is claiming a fiber cut, however we utilize all local > carriers with > > > numerous circuits which are all running fine. > > > > Thank you Bryan. Do you use AT&T? I was thinking that AT&T > > might be the "carrier" UUnet was referring to, and as I > udnerstand, they > > were also having pretty major problems. > > > > --Adam > > -- > > Adam Korab System Administration > > Internet Nebraska (402) 434-8680 x 110 > > > > RFC 882 put the dot in .com, not Sun Microsystems > >
|