North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: IPv6 allocatin (was Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting)
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Christian Kuhtz wrote: > Admittedly an interesting thought to encourage propagation, but then > again, you can't treat an IPv6 migration as if IPv4 is just going to > disappear overnight. So, that type of co-existance might actually be a > good thing. Interop is typically where most issues occur. Are we building production networks or doing experiments? IPv6 exhibits no added functionality over IPv4 + NAT, so why bother? > Pure v4 or v6 stacks are typically no brainers. Yeah, sure, that's why there are so many broken IPv4 stacks around. ---vadim
|