North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: IPv6 allocatin (was Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting)

  • From: Vadim Antonov
  • Date: Fri Sep 01 18:17:16 2000

On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Christian Kuhtz wrote:

> Admittedly an interesting thought to encourage propagation, but then
> again, you can't treat an IPv6 migration as if IPv4 is just going to
> disappear overnight. So, that type of co-existance might actually be a
> good thing.  Interop is typically where most issues occur.

Are we building production networks or doing experiments?  IPv6 exhibits
no added functionality over IPv4 + NAT, so why bother?

> Pure v4 or v6 stacks are typically no brainers.

Yeah, sure, that's why there are so many broken IPv4 stacks around.