North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting
[email protected] wrote: > > So who actually goes to these things, and was the new policy a later > result of discussions at the meeting, or was there actually some sort of > vote at the meeting? There was a count-of-hands vote at either the member or public policy meeeting (I don't remember which one offhand, as it was a while ago). The issue had been discussed by the AC extensively, and we generally decided that we needed to bring the issue to the members before we could decide what the issue was. Interestingly enough the membership was more gung-ho on the idea than the AC was. > i.e. was the policy decision made by one of the ARIN > boards or by the ARIN members? Since ARIN subscription customers are, by > default, ARIN members, will we be given the opportunity to vote or at > least express an opinion on such issues via proxy in the future, or do we > have to send a representative in order for our voice to be heard? The board is the only group that can actually enact new policy at ARIN. As I have been on the ARIN AC since it started, I can say from experience that the board has to date only enacted policy that either or both of the AC or the membership has discussed and reached some sort of concensus on. I realize that is a somewhat indirect answer to your question, but based on what I've said I think you can draw your own conclusions. > > Why would ARIN announce a new policy with completely vague rules? Because ARIN does not presume to know of every single possible legitimate exception to its rules. This was part of what was discussed at the meeting in Calgary. If you think it should be more specific then perhaps you should participate at the meeting in Herndon. Alec -- Alec H. Peterson - [email protected] Staff Scientist CenterGate Research Group - http://www.centergate.com "Technology so advanced, even _we_ don't understand it!"