|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: The last thing I'm gonna say about IRC
'Chanserv decreases nothing' and IRC has long been abandoned by most packetpoopbuttwarriorkiddies, now its networks, 'ISP's' competing with each other for customer share in a failing market place. Shawn McMahon wrote: > On Sun, Aug 20, 2000 at 10:43:10AM -0700, Majdi S. Abbas wrote: > > > Hence, if all the IRC networks would implement Chanserv, and educate users, > > > these attacks would decrease. > > > > Actually, then they get directed at the services, their > > upstream hubs, etc. Trust me on this. As long as IRC is running > > in some way, shape, or form, you have a very big bullseye placed > > on your network. > > I did say "decrease" not "stop entirely". > > Every argument I'm getting thrown back at me is arguing against the latter, > instead of what I actually said. > > If even one person doesn't attack because he can't take over the channel, > and brief service interruption doesn't cut the mustard for him, then using > Chanserv was a good tool, and that's the only claim I made. > > If you want to argue that the attacks won't decrease, fine; but everybody > please stop telling me that they won't cease, because I KNOW THAT ALREADY. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature -- Thank you; |--------------------------------| | Thinking is a learned process. | | ICANN member @large | | Gigabit over IP, ieee 802.17 | |--------------------------------| Henry R. Linneweh
|