North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks?

  • From: John Fraizer
  • Date: Mon Jul 10 12:57:37 2000 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Shawn McMahon wrote:

> Greg considers that to be "forging a HELO", and equates it as "very
> nearly fraud".  You'll have to judge for yourself whether or not that's
> reasonable.
> 
> Frankly, I don't care; I've presented the evidence, everybody can make
> their own choices as to whose idea is reasonable.  With very few exceptions,
> we're all adults here.
> 
> 


OK folks..  Can we take a break from our regularly scheduled flamewar?  It
is very obvious that RLB/ORBS/et all are not issues that we can all agree
on.  Can we just agree not to agree and even more, can we agree NOT to
piss and moan about it on NANOG?  It is sad when one can read through 70
messages on the list in just under 2 seconds just holding the N key in
pine and not miss a single piece of REAL operational content.

PLEASE -- NO MORE!

- ---
John Fraizer
EnterZone, Inc


- -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: 2.6.3a

mQCNAzlo9RIAAAEEAK03prYoSsHIpASXliiU7HMshrsyT9KrigEKgy/ADVB6noQS
Yp5nIlCt4BIV/8oYFloZcNxoo8LDchkDM+0arJcJ9236W+r7nf+UUu8e4hJz0y73
Jq6DEkGY64qbsgF/NBy5xQGnNFyY98KcIbp62m+C5UlTa3NNjIbMmesdFkq5AAUR
tClKb2huIEZyYWl6ZXIgPEpvaG4uRnJhaXplckBFbnRlclpvbmUuTmV0PokAlQMF
EDlo9RKGzJnrHRZKuQEBa/oEAKiYVn+zfRSeGxA5fdK9be1DpN0ygV0UX0ghIUsg
LLAb4bhhGqwXz/my1w5oLIwa4YSOvHzkPzbC0jvEEfbQXlE/bGOqpK8VlznudGy4
DV4p0eu4Ij5gWAdkWmjyI4DfjJL8nVsat9HgE0/IsYi7xwujdvwz6TQWuxmNkQyx
D3aS
=WdqV
- -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBOWn/xYbMmesdFkq5AQEeIgP/dHwg0O/8CyjdZrsLMRFd03DXL/MFHJoC
FUf4eLi8Z2cOiQKCYPjL0lZtE5uLsCdGLzidgJr7RwDjIr5EPHW3+3nyQ782Y3Ou
/idKJ53h5EyXpT+GGu2CPJHetX3Zo+SB90ZX9CYfJSHWjpVRZrr0gkBst2j10ikX
uw2wwW9Jdvs=
=dQq5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----