North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: [load balancing] Re: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron

  • From: tony bourke
  • Date: Fri Jul 07 05:52:27 2000

couple of drawbacks to the LD that other products do not suffer from:

* lack of cookie-based persistance support
* only works when servers and LB instance are on the same subnet (having
them on different subnets would have the LB acting as a router which is
great for packet filtering)
* lack of any other Layer 5 functionality
* is a server-based LB (If you pop one open, you'll see a pentium chip
inside) rather than ASIC based

Tony

On Fri, 7 Jul 2000,
Dru Nelson wrote:

> 
> I'm unhappy with the local director. The fact that it cannot route 
> is a major disappointment (it is more of a switch than a router).
> 
> Dru Nelson
> San Mateo, California
> 
> 
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Alberto Begliomini wrote:
> 
> > It depends which Local Director. The 430 is screaming fast and the 416
> > in conjunction with a 6509 and ASLB is very fast too. I have been using
> > both solutions at customers sites with peak traffic of around a million
> > hits per day.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Alberto U. Begliomini                            Email: [email protected]
> > Coldstone Consulting, LLC                        Phone: 650-400-3990
> > Security, Data Centers Design and Management     Fax:   650-654-5938
> > 
> > 
> > Karyn Ulriksen wrote:
> > > 
> > > > How about Local Director?
> > > 
> > > Everyone I've spoke to about LD is very unhappy with it's performance.
> > > 
> > >  -----Original Message-----
> > > From:   Richard Colella [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent:   Thursday, July 06, 2000 5:38 AM
> > > To:     [email protected]
> > > Subject:        RE: LoadBalancing products:  Foundry ServerIron
> > > 
> > > Products are also available from Alteon, Cisco (Distributed
> > > Director) and Resonate.  Last time I looked, none of these
> > > products does everything one wants, IMHO, but the set union
> > > of features comes pretty close.
> > > 
> > > --Richard
> > > 
> > > >
> > > > I believe BigIP has a product called DNS3 that serves a similar function.
> > > > One of our ".com's" uses it to support their dual co-lo set-up.
> > > >
> > > > -TY
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Brantley Jones [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 10:06 PM
> > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > Subject: RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > At 09:28 PM 7/5/2000 -0400, you wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >they also have the dns based solution
> > > > >available on serverirons.
> > > > >--
> > > > >dima.
> > > >
> > > > Speaking of using a DNS proxy, does anybody know of anybody else doing
> > > this
> > > > besides Foundry??
> > > >
> > > > Brantley
> > > >
> > > >
> > 
> 

-------------- -- ---- ---- --- - - - -  -  -- -  -  -  -   -     -
Tony Bourke				[email protected]