|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: bad idea?
Has foundry figured out how to introduce persistence in their LB's yet? I like their switches and have been waiting for them to get persistence going on. I think I'll jump on that LB list you cited below. Wasn't aware that one was around now. Great idea! Thanx! -Karyn -----Original Message----- From: tony bourke [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 11:11 AM To: Jeremiah Kristal Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: bad idea? actually, Foundry has a global solution based on BGP, check them out. There is a load-balancing mailing list, which addresses such issues. http://vegan.net/lb is the info to sign up. Tony On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Jeremiah Kristal wrote: > > Given a small, globally routable netblock to be used for front-end web > servers, and a strong aversion for using DNS for any type of load > balancing, would it be reasonable to build two identical servers farms > with the same public IP addresses and rely on the BGP sessions with the > hosing providers to remove one advertisement in the event of a problem? > I've been looking at ways to ensure that the webservers are always > available, short of building a network connecting hosting facilities. > > Jeremiah > being a customer stinks > -------------- -- ---- ---- --- - - - - - -- - - - - - - Tony Bourke [email protected]
|