North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: PGP kerserver infrastructure

  • From: Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • Date: Sat Jul 01 17:53:15 2000 
> L. Sassaman : Saturday, July 01, 2000 2:22 PM

> On Sat, 1 Jul 2000, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:
>
> > > L. Sassaman
> > > Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2000 2:58 AM
> > >
> > > On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Michael Helm wrote:
> > >
> > > > "L. Sassaman" writes:
> > > > > X.509 is a much older and cruftier standard. PGP is
> >
> > > > I think is up to customers to decide.
> > >
> > > I think customers *have* decided. Where is PEM now?
> >
> > PEM is being used on every ecommerce site site now, to
implement
>
> Privacy Enhanced Mail != Secure Socket Layer. And this
discussion is
> becoming absurd... I regret getting baited into a flame war,
> and will not
> continue down this line of discussion.

I am talking about PEM formatted keys and certs (*.pem files), as
formatted by OpenSSL. I don't recogise your definition of the
acronym.

Me may have a case of operator over-loading here. I'm also sorry
that you feel that this has become a flame-war. Maybe it is good
that we terminate it.
  • Follow-Ups: