|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: FW: public key service
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 27 Jun 2000 [email protected] wrote: > A slight correction.... > > On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Tsolis, Kristen wrote: > > > > I'm going to try to keep this operational, but it's hard because you're > > > going to find that support for making a robust keyserver network hinges upon > > > people agreeing that such a service is needed, and many PGP users are going > > > to tell you that such a keyserver violates the PGP trust model. > > Hm? These words have been misattributed to me. Oops, was that my fault? Shawn McMahon <[email protected]> is the person quoted there. > I don't see any reason why the PGP trust model would be compromised by > a keyserver network since the individual PGP user is checking keys and > deciding which keys to trust. You are absolutely correct. > I welcome further conversation re:ISP-run keyservers on the > keyserver-folks list, but I hope to see further coordination re: a > NANOG keysigning party on this list. Again, I would be willing to organize this. I have done keysignings of various sizes before, and each time it gets a little smoother. Phil Z. and I have been talking about methods of making large-scale keysignings happen more efficiently, and I would love the chance to see if our ideas will improve things. - --Len. __ L. Sassaman System Administrator | "Everything looks bad Technology Consultant | if you remember it." icq.. 10735603 | pgp.. finger://ns.quickie.net/rabbi | --Homer Simpson -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: OpenPGP Encrypted Email Preferred. iD8DBQE5WQBdPYrxsgmsCmoRAn2rAJ0SgmPfsO89TnhOEN/duxl1wAlT/ACeOuHt 0hPmYLXFE/K2Mgn/TgrOKNg= =7ZI2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|