North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Peering Table Question
To someone troubleshooting a routing or performance problem, it might look operational. A large file of baseline traceroutes could replace the benefits of disclosure, I suppose. Lawyers - 1 Tekkies - 0 my .02 -ls- Jeff Barrows <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Sean - > > We sign and comply with mutual non-disclosure agreements > that inhibit my ability to share that information with you. > > This is not a technical issue. > > I look forward to viewing your backhoe reports. > > - jsb > > -- > Jeff Barrows > Director, Internetwork Engineering > UUNET, an MCI-Worldcom Company > > > > Date: 19 Apr 2000 13:30:38 -0700 > > From: Sean Donelan <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Peering Table Question > > > > On Wed, 19 April 2000, Jeff Barrows wrote: > > > One shouldn't necessarily believe any third-party web > > > pages, documents, articles, or verbal statements about > > > which networks any given network is peered with. > > > > > > Though I have seen many articles, web pages, and other > > > tables that detail which networks are 'peering,' I > > > have never seen an accurate representation of this > > > type of data from a third party. > > > > Then I hope you would step forward and show us the best practice > > for making accurate information available about which networks > > any given network peers with starting with yours. I look forward > > to viewing the information about your network peering on your website > > or IRR or whatever method you decide to use. >
|