North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: Re: Peering Table Question
Unless, of course, the DoJ believes one is trying to be sneaky and get around such concerns. Say, because one made public statements insinuating it. :-) On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Randy Bush wrote: > Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 15:19:43 -0700 > To: Alex Rubenstein <[email protected]> > From: Randy Bush <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Peering Table Question > > > sometimes paid pseudo-peering is nice because, as the payee is really a > customer, one does not have to be as formal about consistent application > of peering qualifications as one does for true peering, when one has to > presume that some day one will be explaining equitable treatment to the > doj, ec, ...