North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus
Why you dragging me into this :-) We have no business relationship with Mr. Cook! Ehud Gavron wrote: > This argument is specious. Gordon isn't press. Well, garlic press > maybe. > > Ehud > p.s. "press credentials" are not hard to fake, but ask Gordon for his > > >On Mon, 03 Apr 2000 21:47:50 -0400 Paul Ferguson wrote: > >> > >> >surprised not to see this mentioned on NANOG > >> > > >> > >Sent: Friday, March 31, 2000 > >> > >To: Notify > >> > >Subject: Exodus Customer Confidential Communication > >> > > > >> > >> Gordon, > >> > >> Does the word "confidential" elude you? > >> > >> - paul > > >Golly Paul, I would not have guessed you would have taken this > >position. > > >If a tobacco company marks a collusion document "CONFIDENTIAL", should > >the press not report it? > > >If a Waco report is market "Top Secret", should the press not report > >it? > > >If Boeing has a flawed design, should the press not report it? > > >There is a fair amount of evidence that an unruly and discourteous > >press is a profound good for society.... > > >regards, > >fletcher > >P.S. "Scandal-Monger", Safire, William, 2000
|