|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus
On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Gordon Cook wrote: > > I am sorry Christian but if you cared enough to read the message to > which you are posting you would see that I am not taking part in this > conversation My mistake... Gordon did not write the statement below. I apologize to Gordon for making the statement. but in any case, this is peering issues... not a death issue > >On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Fletcher E Kittredge wrote: > > > > > Golly Paul, I would not have guessed you would have taken this > > > position. > > > > > > If a tobacco company marks a collusion document "CONFIDENTIAL", should > > > the press not report it? > > > > > > If a Waco report is market "Top Secret", should the press not report > > > it? > > > > > > If Boeing has a flawed design, should the press not report it? > > > > > > There is a fair amount of evidence that an unruly and discourteous > > > press is a profound good for society.... > > > >I am sorry gordon, i have a hard time seeing how something killing people is > >the same as peering. > > > >Christian > > **************************************************************** > The COOK Report on Internet Index to 8 years of the COOK Report > 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA http://cookreport.com > (609) 882-2572 (phone & fax) Battle for Cyberspace: How > [email protected] Crucial Technical . . . - 392 pages > just published. See http://cookreport.com/ipbattle.shtml > **************************************************************** > >
|