North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: www.etrade.com has no DNS A record !
Why is discussion of a single site's DNS configuration screwup appropriate for NANOG? Is your goal to get the word out to people who use E*TRADE? I don't think NANOG is right for that. Is your goal to get the word out to network providers of people who use E*TRADE? Do you really expect that many of them will forward this announcement or make good use of it? Should a message be sent to NANOG every time CNN, Netscape, or Yahoo go down? Am I missing something here? [Like a sense of humor?] --jhawk > Delivered-To: [email protected] > X-Sender: (Unverified) > X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 > Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 11:11:57 -0500 > To: [email protected] > From: Kai Schlichting <[email protected]> > Subject: www.etrade.com has no DNS A record ! > Precedence: bulk > Errors-To: [email protected] > X-Loop: nanog > > > Expect some major customer complaints about this one: www.etrade.com has > no A record, and all other addresses are redirected to that very name. > > I just sent this to Etrade: