North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts)
> Yes, but... > > The first step doing any increase difficult was done when the > HOST_NAME->IP_ADDRESS translation was chosen instead of > > HOST_NAME:SERVICE -> IP_ADDRESS:PORT > > Now we have a lot of troubles due to this choose. Of course if we could implement RFC2052 everywhere... I wonder if _any_ popular end user software has quietly added forward compatibility with SRV records? -Phil
|