|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: IMRSS
On 09/09/99, Daniel MacKay <[email protected]> wrote: > The IMRSS open-mail-relay-protection service has listed one of my machines, > 129.173.1.10, as an open mail relay, I dunno why, coz it ain't. Several > regular mail peers have called me about this. > > www.imrss.com has been down for the last several days, and none of the > phone numbers listed on the NSI contact page for imrss.org work. > > Is anyone running this thing? or is it an unattended dinosaur causing more > problems than it solves? Apparently, IMRSS is totally automated and unattended. Ron Guilmette, who runs it, has a very long history of not taking criticism very well, so I wouldn't be at all surprised if he just ignores your requests. It's really sad to see so many people implement IMRSS, ORBS, or other such things without doing any research on 'em first. For open relays, I'd tend to trust Al Iverson's RRSS list at http://relays.radparker.com/ , because by all accounts it lists exactly what it says it does -- open relays which have been used for spam. The IMRSS and ORBS maintainers have both listed non-relay sites in the past, in violation of their stated purposes. RRSS's FAQ says "by being honest and open and public with our goals and methods, we hope to gain the respect of our fellow internet users." By contrast, IMRSS's FAQ doesn't appear to exist right now (site is down.) And, of course, there's the Mail Abuse Protection System, now at http://mail-abuse.org/ . They, also, comply with their own stated goals and methodologies...and it works. ---------========== J.D. Falk <[email protected]> =========--------- | "The only sure fire way to keep children | | from information that they can't deal with | | is to sedate them until they reach the age of majority." | | -- Paul S. Waterhouse <[email protected]> | ----========== http://www.cybernothing.org/jdfalk/home.html ==========----
|