|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: more internic fun, and an idea
On 4 Aug 99, at 6:36, melinda b. thompson wrote: <snip> > i suggest that internic should prorate the yearly charge and have to > subtract the prorated days that it takes them to process change orders from > the yearly bill for the domain. > > each single one would be just a small ammount. > > however, with as many domains that have been held up in "manual processing" > or whatever, it could add up. > > opinions? As frustrating as it can be to deal with InterNIC, objectively it should be noted that: (1) Your proposal would be costly to enforce because it would be necessary to determine whether the registrant submitted a correctly formed template so that culpability could be determined. (2) It wasn't that long ago that two-week processing was standard for a lot of domain transactions. They raised the bar on themselves by improving turnaround time through automatic processing. I'm not sure that they should now have to pay a price for that. -- Mark Borchers NetworkTwo Communications Group "Give beer to those who are perishing..." (Proverbs 31:6)
|