North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: SYN spoofing
The thread I was responding to refered to filtering all routes (outbound) except those sourced from customers'/internal addresses. Regards, Deepak Jain AiNET On Wed, 28 Jul 1999, Mike Heller wrote: > I have an access list that I apply to all of our incoming interfaces that > blocks the announcement of 127.0.0.1, 192.168.0.0, 10.0.0.0, and > 172.16.0.0. It never changes. I don't see the stated impact on management. > > Mike > > On Wed, 28 Jul 1999, Dan Hollis wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 28 Jul 1999, Deepak Jain wrote: > > > While it is easy, it is not always practical because you often have > > > customers who advertise thousands of prefixes. > > > > Why would this have any impact on filtering rfc1918 and other invalid nets > > like 127.0.0.0/8 and 255.255.255.255? > > > > Or perhaps someone could explain a valid reason to route these addresses. > > > > -Dan > > > > > > >
|