|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Severe Response Degradation
>> > well then, they're obviously clueless. >> >> Hasn't this come up here before? I'm too lazy to go check the >> archive, but I seem to remember a discussion of this topic. IIRC, >> the reason/excuse given (lame or not) was that they use equipment >> that does not deal well/at all with CIDR or VLSM or somesuch. Or >> am I thinking of someone else? > >Well, all of their gear is Cisco. Last I checked, I think Cisco was OK >with CIDR and VLSM, and even unnumbered links. perhaps they need to be told about "ip classless"? >As for the cluelessness statements, my take is that they've got some >very clueful people, and some very clueless people. They've also got the >inertia of a company many times their size. Perhaps that's appropriate, >though, as they are now owned, at least in part, by AT&T (via the TCI >deal). no offense to the clueful then. the clueless won't notice. :) -- |-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----| [email protected] * "ah! i see you have the internet [email protected] (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!" [email protected] * "information is power -- share the wealth."
|