North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: InterNIC - We put the "I" in incompetent.
Michael Dillon <[email protected]> writes: > > Michael, you should know better than that. I do not see a subnet mask on > > these IP addresses. There is nothing stopping a Network Operator from > > making these /32s and putting them on different networks. > > Nothing except community consensus that it is a *BAD* thing to pollute the > global routing table with lots of long prefixes. Um, the point is that they're advertised *internally* as /32, and *externally* as part of their larger aggregate. There's no need to announce the addresses as /32s externally to have this scheme work. We're using this at my place of employ already, and it works quite nicely.