North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: Secondary DNS for Paraguay's TLD?
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 09:20:24AM -0500, [email protected] wrote: > > > Anyone in a situation like this, I'm willing to do secondaries > > for these sorts of domains, and plan to build a secondary-dns-server > > engine that people would be able to send templates to, etc.. > > Same here; nac.net would be willing to host any secondary DNS for anyone, > specifically TLDs or foreign folks. Foreign to the US, that is :-) > > > IMHO, the internic should not allow any domains to have pri+sec nameserver > > in the same /24 > > Amen, except it can be misleading. > > NS1.NAC.NET 220.127.116.11 > NS2.NAC.NET 18.104.22.168 > NS6.NAC.NET 22.214.171.124 > > Whilst 126.96.36.199 and .2 are on the same /24 (obviously), 207.99.0/24 is > subnetted to 256 /32's, and routed to the machines. Why? So, when a > machine/name-server moves within our network, it doesn't have to be > renumbered. My point is that you're doing it correctly. If you lose one of your aggregate blocks, it's not going to cause a problem. Like for example, if someone else started to announce your /24 or a /19 with your dns servers in it. You also distribute nameservers geographically, so if you lose power in a location, you don't die. - jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from [email protected] clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.