North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: spam whore,

  • From: I Am Not An Isp
  • Date: Mon Feb 01 18:39:25 1999

At 05:54 PM 2/1/99 -0500, Dean Anderson wrote:

>This kind of monitoring is probably a direct violation of 18 USC 2511, as
>is a public announcement of the monitoring results. Indeed, at present, I'd
>say it appears to be the best example of an unauthorized 3rd party
>violation I've seen so far. (most [all previous] people don't admit
>details, but we know some do it). Unless of course you have authorization
>from norcal or all the recipients of those 2 million packets to monitor.
>Since norcal isn't your customer, I don't suppose you have any paper
>showing they gave you permission to collect and publish information about
>their traffic.

What type of monitoring are you talking about?  Or are you saying I cannot
filter packets through my network as I please?

>		--Dean


I Am Not An Isp
ISPF, The Forum for ISPs by ISPs, <>
"Think of it as evolution in action." - Niven & Pournelle