North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: spam whore, norcal-systems.net
At 05:54 PM 2/1/99 -0500, Dean Anderson wrote: >This kind of monitoring is probably a direct violation of 18 USC 2511, as >is a public announcement of the monitoring results. Indeed, at present, I'd >say it appears to be the best example of an unauthorized 3rd party >violation I've seen so far. (most [all previous] people don't admit >details, but we know some do it). Unless of course you have authorization >from norcal or all the recipients of those 2 million packets to monitor. >Since norcal isn't your customer, I don't suppose you have any paper >showing they gave you permission to collect and publish information about >their traffic. What type of monitoring are you talking about? Or are you saying I cannot filter packets through my network as I please? > --Dean TTFN, patrick I Am Not An Isp www.ianai.net ISPF, The Forum for ISPs by ISPs, <http://www.ispf.com> "Think of it as evolution in action." - Niven & Pournelle
|