North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: ARIN co-located nameserver problem
On Tue, 8 Dec 1998 [email protected] wrote: > >...Presumably in this case, you are responsible for that nameserver > >and therefore the /32 should be SWIP'd to you. > so well, that Paul decides to sell this as a service to many > small/medium size ISP's, running it on a single server. Now one /32 is > the name server for multiple networks. So the registration system must > be able to deal with that. This is not an unreasonable scenario. In this case Paul would not SWIP the /32 at all since he maintains the responsibility for the server. Presumably then he would handle the registration of the nameserver address with ARIN and the original problem would not occur since the registration application is coming from the entity with administrative control over the IP address in question. -- Michael Dillon - E-mail: [email protected] Check the website for my Internet World articles - http://www.memra.com
|